CRANDALL CONSULTING
HomeTracking Technologies › Microsoft Clarity

Microsoft Clarity: Tracking Behavior & Litigation Context

Published by Crandall Consulting · Informational litigation intelligence · Last substantive update: August 8, 2026

Risk scores, classifications, statistics, and technical findings are informational guidelines based on observed website behavior and publicly available litigation activity, statutes, court decisions, legal commentary, and other public sources. They are not legal advice, legal opinions, or determinations of liability.

What Microsoft Clarity Is

Microsoft Clarity is a free behavioral analytics tool that records how visitors use a website, producing session replays, heatmaps, and interaction analytics.

What It Does

Clarity's script captures DOM mutations, mouse movement, scrolling, clicks, and keystroke events (with masking rules), reconstructing a visitor's session as a playable recording on Microsoft's servers. It also aggregates rage-click, dead-click, and scroll-depth metrics.

Browser Communications Generally Observed

Continuous batched requests to clarity.ms endpoints during a visit, carrying serialized DOM and interaction data, page URLs, and a persistent visitor identifier. Recording typically begins at page load; masking of text inputs depends on configuration and can be incomplete for custom form controls.

How Our Scanner Detects It

Our scanner detects Clarity's script and network traffic, observes whether recording begins before consent, and uses synthetic form interaction with marker values to test whether typed input is transmitted before submission.

Common Implementation Behavior

Often added directly or via tag manager with default settings. Common issues observed include recording enabled on pages containing forms with sensitive fields, incomplete input masking, and recording beginning before any consent interaction.

Litigation & Risk Context

Session replay tools including Clarity have been named repeatedly in website tracking lawsuits invoking state interception statutes, on the theory that recording a visitor's interactions constitutes capturing the contents of a communication. Presence of Clarity is a potential risk indicator meriting configuration review, particularly on form-heavy or sensitive-category sites; it is not a determination that any statute was violated.

Tracked Cases Involving This Technology

No tracked cases currently link to this technology in our source set. This reflects our tracked sources, not an absence of litigation involving the category.

Remediation Options Operators Commonly Consider

Whether any option is appropriate for a specific website is a decision for the operator and qualified counsel.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is session replay illegal?

No court has held that session replay is categorically unlawful, and no statute names it. Plaintiffs have argued that specific implementations amount to interception under specific state statutes, with mixed public outcomes. This page is informational, not legal advice.

Does Clarity record what visitors type?

Clarity captures interaction events and, depending on masking configuration, may capture typed content in unmasked fields. Our scanner tests this empirically with synthetic marker input.

Related Intelligence

Sources

This page is based on direct technical observation by our scanner and vendor documentation; tracked litigation sources will be listed as the intelligence engine links them to this technology.

About This Page

Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.

How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.

Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.

Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.

Is Your Website Creating Hidden Tracking Risk?

Scan your site for third-party tracking and potential wiretap exposure. Free, no account required.

Scan My Website