Website Wiretap Litigation Statistics
The figures on this page are generated directly from our litigation intelligence database — the same dataset that powers the state risk pages and the Website Wiretap Risk Scanner. Counts reflect matters identified in our tracked public source set and are labeled 'Tracked'; they are not official court statistics.
Database Totals
Most Active Jurisdictions
| Jurisdiction | Risk Guideline | Level | Confidence | Trend | Tracked Lawsuits | Tracked Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | 98 | Very High | 96% | stable | 36 | 3 |
| Florida | 68 | High | 96% | rising | 8 | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 52 | Elevated | 96% | rising | 7 | 0 |
| Illinois | 51 | Elevated | 92% | rising | 3 | 0 |
| Connecticut | 50 | Elevated | 96% | rising | 0 | 0 |
| Minnesota | 46 | Elevated | 78% | rising | 1 | 0 |
| New Hampshire | 46 | Elevated | 75% | rising | 2 | 0 |
| Massachusetts | 45 | Elevated | 84% | stable | 2 | 0 |
| Washington | 45 | Elevated | 96% | rising | 1 | 0 |
| Texas | 43 | Moderate | 90% | rising | 0 | 0 |
| Maryland | 41 | Moderate | 90% | rising | 0 | 0 |
| Nevada | 40 | Moderate | 50% | rising | 0 | 0 |
| New Jersey | 39 | Moderate | 84% | stable | 0 | 0 |
| Louisiana | 36 | Moderate | 52% | rising | 1 | 0 |
| Missouri | 36 | Moderate | 58% | rising | 1 | 0 |
Technologies Most Frequently Appearing in Tracked Cases
| Technology | Tracked Case Mentions |
|---|---|
| Meta Pixel | 37 |
| cookies | 33 |
| Google Analytics | 30 |
| tracking pixels | 27 |
| Cookies | 18 |
| session replay | 17 |
| pixels | 13 |
| TikTok Pixel | 12 |
| IP address collection | 11 |
| device fingerprinting | 11 |
| third-party cookies | 9 |
| Tracking pixels | 9 |
Statutes Most Frequently Invoked in Tracked Cases
| Statute | Tracked Case Mentions |
|---|---|
| California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) | 9 |
| Video Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2710 | 3 |
| Florida Security of Communications Act (FSCA) | 3 |
| Video Privacy Protection Act | 2 |
| Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) | 2 |
| California Penal Code §§ 631(a), 638.51, 637.2 | 2 |
| California Invasion of Privacy Act, Cal. Penal Code §§ 631 and 638.51 | 2 |
| California Penal Code §§ 631(a), 638.51(a); Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511 | 2 |
| California Invasion of Privacy Act; California Penal Code §§ 631(a), 638.50(b), 638.51(a) | 2 |
| 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq. | 2 |
| ECPA, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq.; HIPAA, 42 U.S.C. § 1320d et seq. | 2 |
| California Penal Code section 638.51 | 2 |
Jurisdictions Covered
About This Page
Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.
How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.
Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.
Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.
Is Your Website Creating Hidden Tracking Risk?
Scan your site for third-party tracking and potential wiretap exposure. Free, no account required.
Scan My Website