CRANDALL CONSULTING
Home › Research › The State of Website Tracking Litigation: 2026

The State of Website Tracking Litigation: 2026

Published by Crandall Consulting · Informational litigation intelligence · Last substantive update: October 13, 2026

Risk scores, classifications, statistics, and technical findings are informational guidelines based on observed website behavior and publicly available litigation activity, statutes, court decisions, legal commentary, and other public sources. They are not legal advice, legal opinions, or determinations of liability.

This report is generated from the live intelligence database rather than written once and left to age: the jurisdiction rankings, statute and technology frequencies, and trend readings below reflect the current state of our tracked source set and update as new intelligence runs complete.

The National Picture

214
Tracked Lawsuits
4
Tracked Matters
0
Tracked Demand Letters
5
Reported Claims
1571
Tracked Sources
223
Tracked Case Records

Statistic labels: Official = government/court published; Estimated = derived with stated method; Tracked = counted in the Crandall intelligence database; Reported = claimed by a third-party source. Counts on this page are Tracked unless labeled otherwise.

Where Activity Is Concentrated

The ten highest current risk guidelines in our database:

JurisdictionRisk GuidelineLevelConfidenceTrendTracked LawsuitsTracked Matters
California98Very High96%stable363
Florida68High96%rising80
Pennsylvania52Elevated96%rising70
Illinois51Elevated92%rising30
Connecticut50Elevated96%rising00
Minnesota46Elevated78%rising10
New Hampshire46Elevated75%rising20
Massachusetts45Elevated84%stable20
Washington45Elevated96%rising10
Texas43Moderate90%rising00

Trend Direction

Jurisdictions currently trending upward in our data: Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming. Trend readings compare recent snapshots of each jurisdiction's tracked activity.

Technologies Driving Tracked Matters

TechnologyTracked Case Mentions
Meta Pixel37
cookies33
Google Analytics30
tracking pixels27
Cookies18
session replay17
pixels13
TikTok Pixel12
IP address collection11
device fingerprinting11
third-party cookies9
Tracking pixels9

Statutes Doing the Work

StatuteTracked Case Mentions
California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA)9
Video Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 27103
Florida Security of Communications Act (FSCA)3
Video Privacy Protection Act2
Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA)2
California Penal Code §§ 631(a), 638.51, 637.22
California Invasion of Privacy Act, Cal. Penal Code §§ 631 and 638.512
California Penal Code §§ 631(a), 638.51(a); Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 25112
California Invasion of Privacy Act; California Penal Code §§ 631(a), 638.50(b), 638.51(a)2
18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq.2
ECPA, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq.; HIPAA, 42 U.S.C. § 1320d et seq.2
California Penal Code section 638.512

What Website Operators Should Take From This

The data continues to reward the same review discipline: know every third-party script on your site, know what each transmits and when relative to consent, and re-verify after every change. Technology detection is an informational risk indicator — the configuration details determine what, if anything, needs to change.

Jurisdictions Covered

About This Page

Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.

How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.

Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.

Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.

Is Your Website Creating Hidden Tracking Risk?

Scan your site for third-party tracking and potential wiretap exposure. Free, no account required.

Scan My Website