Singh v. The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital Operating Corp., et al.
Summary
The court-authorized FAQ describes a class action alleging that Cone Health improperly tracked website users' information, including on its MyChart patient portal. The parties agreed to a proposed $1,765,000 settlement covering qualifying portal access or website form submissions between September 1, 2016, and November 3, 2022, with a claim deadline of October 5, 2026. Final approval remains pending as described in the FAQ, and the settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing or a court determination against Cone Health.
Litigation Status
Procedural Posture
The parties agreed to a proposed class action settlement, with notice authorized and final court approval pending.
What the Court Decided
The court authorized notice of the proposed class action settlement.
What the Court Did Not Decide
The court did not decide in favor of either party or determine that Cone Health had done anything wrong. The FAQ describes final settlement approval as pending.
Significance
Neutral / mixed significance. Characterizations of significance describe how the matter has generally been discussed in tracked public sources; individual holdings are often narrow, procedural, or fact-specific, and this page does not state or imply broader holdings than the sources support.
What This Page Does and Does Not Say
This page reports what our tracked public sources say about this matter — including, where identified, the procedural posture (for example, a ruling on a motion to dismiss is not a final merits decision). It does not report legal conclusions beyond those sources, does not predict outcomes, and does not constitute legal advice.
Technologies at Issue
- Website pixels, as identified in the settlement title
- MyChart patient portal
- Website submission forms
Statutes Invoked
No specific statutes have been identified in tracked sources for this matter.
Claims Asserted
- Alleged improper tracking of users' information on Cone Health's website, including the MyChart patient portal
What This Matter May Mean for Website Operators
For operators using similar technologies, the recurring factual questions in matters like this one are whether advertising pixels transmit page URLs or hashed form data before a consent choice. Our scanner tests these behaviors empirically.
Because this matter is pending, anything reported here is procedural — allegations and interim rulings, not final determinations.
Detection of a similar technology on a website is an informational risk indicator, not a legal conclusion, and nothing in this section is legal advice.
Related Intelligence
Sources
About This Page
Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.
How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.
Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.
Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.
Is Your Website Creating Hidden Tracking Risk?
Scan your site for third-party tracking and potential wiretap exposure. Free, no account required.
Scan My Website