Kueppers et al. v. Zumba Fitness, LLC

Published by Crandall Consulting · Informational litigation intelligence · Last substantive update: October 12, 2026

Docket / citation: 24-cv-61983-WPD

Summary

Plaintiffs allege Zumba transmitted URLs exposing purchasers’ names and video-course purchases to advertisers. The court certified a class and three subclasses, excluding NextRoll; TradeDesk subclass claims had already been abandoned. This was a certification ruling, not a final merits judgment. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flsdce/0%3A2024cv61983/677430/85/))

Litigation Status

Status, direction, and weight describe how tracked public sources characterize this matter as of our last review — they are informational classifications, not legal assessments.

Procedural Posture

Class certification following denial of dismissal and judgment-on-the-pleadings motions; representatives and counsel appointed, with class notice submissions ordered. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flsdce/0%3A2024cv61983/677430/85/))

Reported Holding

The court granted Rule 23(b)(3) certification of a nationwide class and Meta, Pinterest, and MNTN subclasses. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flsdce/0%3A2024cv61983/677430/85/))

What the Court Decided

Rule 23 requirements were satisfied; individualized standing inquiries did not defeat predominance. NextRoll was excluded because named plaintiffs lacked evidence of disclosures to it. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flsdce/0%3A2024cv61983/677430/85/))

What the Court Did Not Decide

The order did not finally adjudicate liability or award damages. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flsdce/0%3A2024cv61983/677430/85/))

Significance

Generally viewed as plaintiff-favorable. Characterizations of significance describe how the matter has generally been discussed in tracked public sources; individual holdings are often narrow, procedural, or fact-specific, and this page does not state or imply broader holdings than the sources support.

What This Page Does and Does Not Say

This page reports what our tracked public sources say about this matter — including, where identified, the procedural posture (for example, a ruling on a motion to dismiss is not a final merits decision). It does not report legal conclusions beyond those sources, does not predict outcomes, and does not constitute legal advice.

Technologies at Issue

• Website tracking technologies
• Cookies
• Order-confirmation URLs

Third parties named or identified in tracked sources: Meta, Pinterest, MNTN, NextRoll, TradeDesk.

Statutes Invoked

• Video Privacy Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2710. ([law.justia.com](https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/florida/flsdce/0%3A2024cv61983/677430/85/))

Claims Asserted

Claims identified in tracked public sources; pleadings may include additional or amended claims.

• VPPA disclosure of personally identifiable information

What This Matter May Mean for Website Operators

Because this matter is pending, anything reported here is procedural — allegations and interim rulings, not final determinations.

Detection of a similar technology on a website is an informational risk indicator, not a legal conclusion, and nothing in this section is legal advice.

Related Intelligence

Sources

• Kueppers et al. v. Zumba Fitness, LLC — Order Granting Class Certification — Justia — U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · Tier A (Primary authority) · 2026-08-19

About This Page

Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.

How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.

Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.

Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.