Heredia Crespi et al. v. BayCare Health System, Inc.
Summary
Plaintiffs allege that BayCare used Google Analytics 4 and DoubleClick on its website without visitors’ consent, transmitting sensitive medical information and electronic communications to Google. The court granted in part and denied in part BayCare’s motion to dismiss, but the excerpt does not specify the disposition of individual claims.
Litigation Status
Procedural Posture
Motion to dismiss the operative amended complaint, following dismissal of the original complaint without prejudice as a shotgun pleading.
Reported Holding
The court granted in part and denied in part BayCare’s motion to dismiss. The bounded excerpt does not identify which claims were dismissed or survived.
What the Court Decided
The court granted in part and denied in part BayCare’s motion to dismiss.
Significance
Neutral / mixed significance. Characterizations of significance describe how the matter has generally been discussed in tracked public sources; individual holdings are often narrow, procedural, or fact-specific, and this page does not state or imply broader holdings than the sources support.
What This Page Does and Does Not Say
This page reports what our tracked public sources say about this matter — including, where identified, the procedural posture (for example, a ruling on a motion to dismiss is not a final merits decision). It does not report legal conclusions beyond those sources, does not predict outcomes, and does not constitute legal advice.
Technologies at Issue
- Google Analytics 4 Tracker
- DoubleClick Tracker
Third parties named or identified in tracked sources: Google.
Statutes Invoked
- Florida Security of Communications Act, Fla. Stat. §§ 934.03 and 934.10; federal Wiretap Act
Claims Asserted
- Florida Security of Communications Act
- federal Wiretap Act
- breach of confidence
- unjust enrichment
What This Matter May Mean for Website Operators
For operators using similar technologies, the recurring factual questions in matters like this one are what page URLs and query strings analytics tools share with third parties. Our scanner tests these behaviors empirically.
Because this matter is pending, anything reported here is procedural — allegations and interim rulings, not final determinations.
Detection of a similar technology on a website is an informational risk indicator, not a legal conclusion, and nothing in this section is legal advice.
Related Intelligence
Sources
About This Page
Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.
How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.
Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.
Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.
Is Your Website Creating Hidden Tracking Risk?
Scan your site for third-party tracking and potential wiretap exposure. Free, no account required.
Scan My Website