Delsignore v. Zazzle, Inc.
Summary
A proposed class action filed Oct. 13, 2022 (Delsignore v. Zazzle, Inc.) alleges Zazzle used session-replay software on www.zazzle.com to record visitors' mouse movements, clicks, keystrokes, search terms and other inputs without disclosure or consent. The complaint asserts this conduct violated the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act and seeks to represent Pennsylvania residents whose electronic communications were allegedly intercepted.
Litigation Status
Procedural Posture
Plaintiff filed a 21-page putative class action complaint on October 13, 2022 alleging Zazzle used session replay software to record website visitors and asserting a claim under the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act; the suit seeks to represent Pennsylvania residents who visited zazzle.com.
Significance
Generally viewed as plaintiff-favorable. Characterizations of significance describe how the matter has generally been discussed in tracked public sources; individual holdings are often narrow, procedural, or fact-specific, and this page does not state or imply broader holdings than the sources support.
What This Page Does and Does Not Say
This page reports what our tracked public sources say about this matter — including, where identified, the procedural posture (for example, a ruling on a motion to dismiss is not a final merits decision). It does not report legal conclusions beyond those sources, does not predict outcomes, and does not constitute legal advice.
Technologies at Issue
Statutes Invoked
Claims Asserted
- Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act claim (as alleged in the complaint)
What This Matter May Mean for Website Operators
Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Control Act (WESCA) is an all-party consent statute with a private right of action. Consent standard and private enforceability are the structural features that most shape where website tracking claims are filed and how they are valued.
For operators using similar technologies, the recurring factual questions in matters like this one are when session recording begins relative to consent and whether input masking covers every field. Our scanner tests these behaviors empirically.
Because this matter is pending, anything reported here is procedural — allegations and interim rulings, not final determinations.
Detection of a similar technology on a website is an informational risk indicator, not a legal conclusion, and nothing in this section is legal advice.
Related Intelligence
Sources
About This Page
Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.
How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.
Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.
Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.
Is Your Website Creating Hidden Tracking Risk?
Scan your site for third-party tracking and potential wiretap exposure. Free, no account required.
Scan My Website