Del Salto v. Rolex Watch USA Inc.

Published by Crandall Consulting · Informational litigation intelligence · Last substantive update: October 12, 2026

Summary

Bloomberg Law reports that Rolex Watch USA Inc. agreed to settle a proposed class action brought by Alexander Del Salto, who filed a notice of settlement in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. Del Salto alleged that Rolex’s website used tracking tools to disclose consumers’ personal information to Meta and Google for targeted advertising, including installing 107 third-party trackers on his browser. The excerpt does not disclose settlement terms or report a merits ruling.

Litigation Status

Status, direction, and weight describe how tracked public sources characterize this matter as of our last review — they are informational classifications, not legal assessments.

Procedural Posture

Rolex agreed to settle a proposed class action; lead plaintiff Alexander Del Salto filed a notice of settlement in federal district court.

What the Court Did Not Decide

The excerpt reports no ruling on the merits or on class certification.

Significance

Neutral / mixed significance. Characterizations of significance describe how the matter has generally been discussed in tracked public sources; individual holdings are often narrow, procedural, or fact-specific, and this page does not state or imply broader holdings than the sources support.

What This Page Does and Does Not Say

This page reports what our tracked public sources say about this matter — including, where identified, the procedural posture (for example, a ruling on a motion to dismiss is not a final merits decision). It does not report legal conclusions beyond those sources, does not predict outcomes, and does not constitute legal advice.

Technologies at Issue

• Website data-tracking tools
• Third-party browser trackers
• Targeted advertising

Third parties named or identified in tracked sources: Meta Platforms Inc., Google LLC.

Statutes Invoked

No specific statutes have been identified in tracked sources for this matter.

Claims Asserted

Claims identified in tracked public sources; pleadings may include additional or amended claims.

• Alleged disclosure of consumers' personal information under state and federal privacy laws
• Wiretap claims described in the article title
• Alleged disclosure of consumers’ personal information under state and federal privacy laws
• Wiretap claims described in the headline
• Wiretap claims described in the article headline

Related Intelligence

Sources

• Rolex Reaches Deal in Wiretap Lawsuit Over Web Data Disclosure — Bloomberg Law · Tier B (Authoritative secondary) · 2026-09-22
• Rolex Reaches Deal in Wiretap Lawsuit Over Web Data Disclosure — Bloomberg Law · Tier B (Authoritative secondary) · 2026-09-22

About This Page

Publisher: Inspection-Ready Institute, Inc. (DBA Crandall Consulting), an independent website compliance and risk consultancy. We are not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.

How this content is produced: Facts are extracted from publicly available sources — court and government materials, recognized legal press, professional analysis, and industry reports — by our litigation intelligence engine, stored with full source provenance, and rendered from the database. Risk guidelines are computed by a deterministic formula, never by an AI model directly. See the full methodology.

Limitations: Counts labeled "Tracked" reflect matters identified in our source set and are not official court statistics. We report what courts decided and did not decide; we do not predict outcomes.

Corrections: If you believe anything on this page is inaccurate, contact us via the contact page and we will review the underlying sources promptly.